Tools

Feeling stuck in my studio I decided I had to go for a walk.  The minute I started walking thoughts began jumping around and colliding.  I walked to the gate where I got lost before and saw that if I'd only pushed open the gate I would have been so close to my studio.  Argh!

So these are the thought crowding my brain as I sit on a redwood stump in a forest that feels centuries old with ferns scattered like bits of lace and the sun filtering through sentinel trees that reach up forever to the sky.

Last night one of the scientists, Curt, gave us a presentation of how he looks at art from a chemical viewpoint, analyzing the types of paint, surfaces, colors, etc.  He gave us the chemical composition of some paints used in famous paintings and where they historically have been derived from.  I was particularly interested when he said he is now looking beyond Western art to other cultures to examine the materials they use and how they have stood the test of time.

I am drawn to masks of different cultures and particularly to totem poles.  In British Columbia and Alaska I have gasped at the magnificence of these poles, standing in clusters or as a solitary witness. They are astonishing.   The elements have taken their toll on them, particularly because they are in wet, rainy climates.  Some list like drunken guardians, some are partially decomposed.  The ones that are painted are faded and weathered.  I asked Curt if he knew what kinds of paints they used, presuming they were derived from nature - plants, insects, etc.  He didn't know but said the key to retaining the color would be the type of sealant they used, and there were a few that could be made from natural materials.  It would be interesting not only to know what was used, but if certain tribes used certain materials or if it was shared knowledge.  Also do present-day totem carvers follow the old ways or use newer materials.

I've been exploring tools with collaborators Michael Masucci and Kate Johnson, using tools as one of the connecting themes in our recent project Fly By.  Scientists and artists both have a set of tools that we use.  In Fly By we used a flying camera as a metaphor of sorts for the Hubble telescope.  The Hubble offers us views of the cosmos that we would not otherwise see.  The flying camera (mounted on a drone) gave audiences views of the dancers (overhead, circling them from different angles) that an audience would not ordinarily see.

Tools can offer immortality.  A painting can exist for centuries i.e. the cave drawings in France, the sarcophagi in Egypt.  The images from the Hubble presumably can survive throughout time.  The dancer's main tool though is the body, which is not immortal.  Dance can be preserved through digital documentation but it is never the same as when experienced live, unless it is specifically made for film.  It is a live art because it involves an exchange of energy - between dancers and between dancers and audience.  That energy is not captured as a living, breathing thing on video.  Dancers learn of impermanence, of constant change, of loss, it defines their art.   Because the body is the tool and the body deteriorates.  That is both its beauty and its tragedy.